Discussion about this post

User's avatar
VA Investor's avatar

The funniest part of each quarterly report is the Agricultural section:

'The results were expected to be good this year, with an expected production of XXX except for.YYY'

For YYY insert: weather was too hot, too cold, too wet, too dry, too wet and then too dry, no weather problems so harvest was so good for everyone that sales prices were very low, Polar Vortex, La nina, El nino, fungus, nut rot, mildew, insects, floods, immigration laws limiting harvesting, Sun spots, lunar cycles, earthquake in Nigeria, the plague, dogs and cats living together.

I have learned that farming is a tricky business from reading the Pardee reports year after year.

Cody's avatar

Thanks for the great writeup as always, Dave.

This is not about Pardee but about your “Alpine” investments in the fund - I fully agree that they are irreplaceable assets (I live in Switzerland). But how do you underwrite “disaster” risks? Floods, landslides etc can cause disruptions and even massive damage sometimes (like in Blatten this year).

This creates a dilemma where the assets are high quality and safe, but might require substantial capex every now and then. How do you incorporate this aspect into your assessment?

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?